Telegram removal
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
- Traqeer
Messages, channels and groups must be counted separately.
Read the cases and sources →The agency decision guide · November 2026
Best OnlyFans DMCA takedown services for agencies
Compare Telegram, social and fake-account removal coverage for your roster. Read named agency feedback, creator cases and reporting requirements, with Google evidence in support.
Compare the platform evidence ↗Answer in brief
Match the service to your roster’s platforms.
Six named agency testimonials across Fanlock, Rulta and Ceartas add operational context. The channel comparisons separate published coverage from reported cases; neither establishes a measured agency-wide success rate.
Compare by removal outcome
Telegram, social posts and fake accounts.
Choose the category that matches the problem. Start with the published cases, then check coverage and plan limits.
Social-platform removal
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
Posts, media items and disabled accounts are different outcomes; report each platform separately.
Read the cases and sources →Impersonation account removal
- BranditScan
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
Count verified fake-account disabling separately from copied-post removal.
Read the cases and sources →Providers are listed alphabetically, without numbered positions or category winners. Comparable performance evidence is not available. Other providers remain in the coverage comparison; missing published cases do not demonstrate poor service. Google is supporting evidence only.
Supporting Google evidence
The historical Google benchmark.
Google removal evidence through November 4, 2026. Reviewed November 8, 2026.
Per-owner removal output. This guide gives more weight to observed removal output per recorded owner. Fanlock leads this particular weighted Google model with 69.39 / 75 points. This does not establish performance on Telegram, social platforms or impersonation cases.
Mean removals per recorded owner carry 55 points, removal percentage 15, and total removals 5. The remaining 25 points for reviews, documented comparative switching outcomes and measured platform turnaround are unscored.
This is the shared Google benchmark, not a separate agency-performance ranking. The export does not identify agency-managed rosters. Named agency testimonials and advertised team tools are compared below.
Different Google metrics, different leaders
Among these nine services in the supplied all-time snapshot. These are search-delisting measures, not category winners for Telegram, social platforms or impersonation.
Highest mean removals per recorded owner
Fanlock
32,128 URL occurrences
Highest removed-to-submitted percentage
Leakless
95.66%
Largest total removal volume
BranditScan
331,614,833 URL occurrences
Recorded owner IDs are not verified individual creators; counts can include repeated URLs. Customer mix, case difficulty and time in service differ. The weighted benchmark below combines these measures under the disclosed formula.
| Rank / service | Mean removed / owner ID | Removed / submitted | Total removed | Points / 75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Fanlock Read analysis | 32,128 | 95.01% | 9,092,241 | 69.39 |
| 2 BranditScan Read analysis | 17,482 | 62.84% | 331,614,833 | 44.35 |
| 3 Ceartas Read analysis | 9,098 | 76.50% | 54,424,314 | 27.87 |
| 4 Rulta Read analysis | 7,818 | 72.82% | 172,833,764 | 26.91 |
| 5 Bruqi Read analysis | 9,816 | 49.26% | 34,208,539 | 24.71 |
| 6 Traqeer Read analysis | 4,389 | 94.43% | 2,765,285 | 21.72 |
| 7 Leakless Read analysis | 765 | 95.66% | 111,744 | 15.66 |
| 8 Lock Leaks Read analysis | 2,217 | 72.28% | 250,563 | 14.64 |
| 9 Sidenty Read analysis | 1,246 | 82.72% | 1,572,040 | 14.56 |
“Owner” means a recorded Google copyright-owner ID, not a verified unique creator. Counts are URL occurrences; they are not unique files or confirmed source-site deletions. Means are rounded for display; scores use unrounded data. This is a weighted ranking, so it does not sort strictly by the first column.
See the formula and denominator · Check every reporting entity · Google’s report definitions
55% Per-owner removals15% Removal rate10% Reviews · pending5% Switch outcomes · pending10% Turnaround · pending5% Total removals
Make the comparison useful
Follow the leak through the whole process.
Use the ranking to open a conversation, then request one redacted case from discovery through outcome. A strong Google record is relevant to search visibility; source removal, repeat-upload monitoring and unresolved-case support still need their own evidence.
Check 01Separate creator authorization
Check 02Case-level status exports
Check 03Escalation ownership
Check 04Workload and roster pricing
Discovery
Ask which sites and search surfaces are monitored, how often, and how missed copies can be submitted.
Submission
Ask what information is required from you and how the service checks each notice before filing.
Verification
Ask for separate evidence of a host removal and a search delisting, with a timestamp for each.
Agency evidence · checked 2026-11-08
What named agencies say.
Six named agency testimonials were located across three vendor sites. These are attributed summaries, not interviews or independently verified results. Roster sizes were not verified, so no agency-size bonus is assigned.
Fanlock
named vendor-published testimonial
- Lost Media · 2026-08-19
Praises leak detection, responsiveness and updates for its creators.
Advertised agency tools: Roster dashboard, Creator-specific access, Account manager.
Agency identity, roster size and outcomes have not been independently corroborated.
Source pageRulta
named vendor-published testimonials
- Aura Modeling
Praises communication and support.
- Palette Media
Praises proactive support and monitoring across its creator roster.
- Patty Cakes Agency
Credits protection with preserving content exclusivity and supporting sales.
Advertised agency tools: Per-creator reports, Staff and creator access, Prorated roster changes.
Testimonials have no displayed dates, audited sales attribution or verified roster sizes.
Source pageCeartas
named vendor-published testimonials and a collective case study
- ELYSM
Praises automation and time saved managing protection.
- Profile Mgmt Agency
Praises speed, monitoring and leak removal.
- Sidemen / Side+ · creator collective case study
Ceartas claims over 700,000 leaks removed and a 43% reduction in IP threats over six months.
Advertised agency tools: Unified reporting, Creator access, Volume pricing.
The Sidemen result is a vendor case claim, not a comparable Google-only figure or a management-agency review. Animated zero counters were not treated as data.
Source pageBranditScan
No named agency review located on the page checked
Advertised agency tools: Roster tools, Team permissions, Safelists, Consolidated billing.
Business logos and creator merch photos are not agency reviews. Homepage studio testimonial attributed to Kira Noir is kept separate; the studio is unnamed.
Source pageTraqeer
No named agency review located in accessible content
Advertised agency tools: Roster pricing, Dedicated support.
Named creator testimonials on the homepage are not agency testimonials.
Source pageBruqi
No named agency review located on the page checked
Homepage contains creator testimonials; no separately attributable agency review was found.
Source pageLeakless
No named agency review located on the page checked
Advertised agency tools: Shared billing, Roster dashboard, Account manager.
An early agency product description is not customer-outcome evidence.
Source pageSidenty
No named agency review located in accessible pages
Creator page has an unpopulated Reviews section in the text view.
Source pageLock Leaks
Agency page could not be retrieved
Homepage mentions agency workspaces. Named reviews remain unverified; this is not evidence that none exist.
Source pageAdditional business evidence: a public Trustpilot review by “kevott,” dated June 21, 2026, describes Fanlock use at Wifeysworld. This is a studio/business review, not an identified management-agency review. Review source.
Read beyond the position
Provider notes: the supporting Google results.
Every service has a measurable strength and a limitation worth checking.
9 services shown.
01
Fanlock
69.39 / 75 Google pointsHighest mean and median removals per recorded owner in this cohort, with a 95.01% removal rate. It leads when per-owner output receives the largest weight.
283Recorded owner IDs
19,287Median removed / owner
95.01%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The denominator is 283 recorded owner IDs. These are not independently verified unique paying creators, and the observed reporting history begins in February 2026.
Public creator evidence: The supplied blossom_moonlight story favors Fanlock over Rulta. A public Sailor Scholar review also describes a positive experience. Neither establishes an audited comparative result.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2026-02-01 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Fanlock ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
02
BranditScan
44.35 / 75 Google pointsLargest total Google removal volume in the cohort and the second-highest mean per recorded owner. Those strengths support its position in the weighted benchmark.
18,969Recorded owner IDs
2,324Median removed / owner
62.84%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its all-time removal rate is 62.84%. The large and longer-lived reporting pool is not directly comparable to a small creator roster without considering tenure and client mix.
Public creator evidence: The website features creators including Brandi Love, Kira Noir and Aria Lee. Featured names and promotional result counts do not establish current subscriptions or follower counts.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2020-10-07 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit BranditScan ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
03
Ceartas
27.87 / 75 Google pointsA 76.50% removal rate and 9,098 mean removals per recorded owner support Ceartas in the weighted benchmark.
5,982Recorded owner IDs
1,013.5Median removed / owner
76.50%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The 1,013.5 median is substantially below the mean, indicating an uneven distribution. Its creator-collective and agency case claims use measures that are separate from this Google dataset.
Public creator evidence: Ceartas features Sidemen, Belle_OHaraXXX and other creators. SweetieFox also appears in its Google records; overlapping Fanlock activity does not establish an exclusive move.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2021-04-15 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Ceartas ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
04
Rulta
26.91 / 75 Google pointsSecond-largest total removal volume in the cohort, with 7,818 mean removals per recorded owner and a 72.82% removal rate.
22,106Recorded owner IDs
1,201Median removed / owner
72.82%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its 22,106 recorded owner IDs form the largest denominator here. Long-lived and mixed owner records can pull an all-time average away from the experience of an active individual creator.
Public creator evidence: Sophie Rain appears under Rulta in the selected Google profiles. Historical Pinkchyu and overlapping Athena Kami records also appear; these associations are not endorsements.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2018-10-26 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Rulta ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
05
Bruqi
24.71 / 75 Google pointsThird-highest mean removals per recorded owner at 9,816, ahead of Ceartas and Rulta on that single measure.
3,485Recorded owner IDs
2,837Median removed / owner
49.26%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its 49.26% all-time removal rate reduces its weighted score. A different weighting would change the order; the published formula makes that tradeoff explicit.
Public creator evidence: Featured names include Thicky Tatiana and Ava Louise. Likes shown in some testimonials are not follower counts and receive no audience-size bonus.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2023-06-20 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Bruqi ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
06
Traqeer
21.72 / 75 Google pointsA 94.43% removal rate supports its weighted result, alongside 4,389 mean removals per recorded owner.
630Recorded owner IDs
1,173.5Median removed / owner
94.43%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its total recorded removal volume is smaller than the largest providers. Provider-published audience counts for featured creators have not been independently verified.
Public creator evidence: Traqeer features Karol Rosado, Patty Lopez, Criss Geithner and Itstereels. Karol Rosado records overlap BranditScan activity near the end of the snapshot.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2022-06-11 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Traqeer ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
07
Leakless
15.66 / 75 Google pointsHighest all-time removal percentage in this cohort at 95.66%. This is a useful distinction for readers prioritizing that single measure.
146Recorded owner IDs
289.5Median removed / owner
95.66%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: It has 111,744 recorded removals across 146 owner IDs, giving a mean of 765. Its smaller observed volume limits what the high percentage alone can tell us.
Public creator evidence: Image testimonials and interface result cards were not resolved into sufficiently clear creator identities for review scoring.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2025-11-29 to 2026-10-10. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Leakless ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
08
Lock Leaks
14.64 / 75 Google pointsThe all-time snapshot contains 250,563 removals, averaging 2,217 per recorded owner, with a 72.28% removal rate.
113Recorded owner IDs
550Median removed / owner
72.28%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The cohort contains 113 owner IDs. A higher rate in the recent-window analysis is a different measure and is not substituted into this all-time ranking.
Public creator evidence: The Ms Luna interface was treated as a product demonstration, not a verified customer. The agency page could not be retrieved during this review.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2023-11-28 to 2026-10-29. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Lock Leaks ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
09
Sidenty
14.56 / 75 Google pointsAn 82.72% removal rate and 1,246 mean removals per recorded owner provide a measurable Google reporting record.
1,262Recorded owner IDs
9Median removed / owner
82.72%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The median is 9 removals per recorded owner, far below the mean. This distribution makes the average a particularly limited description of a typical owner record.
Public creator evidence: Pinkchyu appears in historical Sidenty records. Named testimonials were not readable on the checked creator page, so no review conclusion is drawn from their absence.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2022-01-18 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Sidenty ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
Creator names, audiences and service histories
Who appears in the public records?
These reporting associations answer a narrower question than “who is a current customer?” They show which selected service submitted Google requests for a matching owner name. Audience figures below are third-party counters and are not yet applied to scores.
| Creator / audience evidence | Services in the selected Google profiles | What we can conclude |
|---|---|---|
| Sophie Rain 8,895,533 Instagram followers Audience source · 2026-11-06 | Rulta 2023-06-20 → 2026-11-03 | Rulta filings run from June 2023 through November 3, 2026. Other submitters, including profiles named Sophie Rain, also appear; they are not authenticated clients or confirmed moves. |
| SweetieFox 4,634,414 Instagram followers Audience source · snapshot date not stated | Ceartas 2024-11-01 → 2026-11-03 Fanlock 2026-02-06 → 2026-11-03 | Fanlock starts in February 2026, but Ceartas and Fanlock both file through November 3. No evidence in these dates that SweetieFox left Ceartas. |
| Athena Kami 1,589,192 Instagram followers Audience source · 2026-10-26 Suffix variants are shown separately and are not added to the exact-name total. | Ceartas 2026-03-08 → 2026-05-22 Fanlock 2026-05-16 → 2026-11-03 Rulta 2026-10-29 → 2026-11-03 | Ceartas filings end May 22, 2026; Fanlock starts May 16. Rulta starts October 29 while Fanlock continues through November 3. Possible additional or changing representation; no exclusive switch established. |
| Pinkychu 647,077 Instagram followers Audience source · snapshot date not stated Pinkychu is the user-corrected lookup spelling. Pinkchyu is retained as a user-linked candidate alias. Google owner IDs 6247316 and 593882 differ; the identity link has not been independently verified. | Sidenty 2023-11-06 → 2024-03-18 Rulta 2024-06-15 → 2026-09-14 Ceartas 2025-06-09 → 2026-01-18 Fanlock 2026-05-18 → 2026-11-03 | The corrected spelling Pinkychu matches Fanlock owner ID 6247316: May 18–November 3, 2026. The earlier spelling Pinkchyu matches owner ID 593882 under Sidenty, Rulta and Ceartas. If these are the same creator, Fanlock overlaps Rulta through September 14; no exclusive switch is established. The cross-spelling identity link is user-supplied, not independently verified. |
Corrected creator lookup
Pinkychu · Fanlock
73,279 removed / 74,783 submitted · 97.99%, across 316 requests from 2026-05-18 to 2026-11-03.
Reporter 2529688 / owner 6247316. The earlier spelling Pinkchyu uses owner 593882 and is retained as a user-linked candidate alias. The identity link is not independently verified. These requests were already included in Fanlock’s aggregate, so the correction does not change the service ranking. Google reporting profile.
Sophie Rain’s records show Rulta in this nine-service cohort. SweetieFox has overlapping Ceartas and Fanlock activity. Athena Kami has Ceartas, Fanlock and later Rulta activity, including overlap. None establishes a confirmed exclusive switch or the reason for one.
See exact creator totals, dates and owner IDs · Download all 83 creator/service rows
Platform turnaround
Speed needs outcome timestamps.
No comparable, independently measured platform turnaround is available for Fanlock, BranditScan, Ceartas, Rulta, Traqeer, Bruqi, Leakless, Sidenty or Lock Leaks in this evidence set. Google submission dates do not show when a platform completed a removal.
The proposed current platform model assigns 15% to measured turnaround; it remains unscored. Marketing estimates and single-review experiences are recorded as claims, not converted into average response times.
StartRecord a valid submission timestamp.
FinishVerify the outcome and its timestamp.
SeparateGroup Google, hosts and social platforms.
IncludeKeep pending and failed cases in view.
Read the outcome correctly
A search result and a source file are separate.
A Google removal is evidence about search visibility. It is not confirmation that the hosting site deleted the material. Ask for separate reports of submitted requests, verified outcomes and cases still pending.
Your buying checklist
Five questions.
A clearer decision.
Keep the answers alongside the comparison. A service’s observed results and the plan it offers you are different parts of the decision.
Your selections stay in this browser. No URLs, files or personal information are requested.
0 of 5 questions reviewed.
Common questions
Before you choose.
Does a submitted notice mean a leak is gone?
No. A submission records a request. Ask for a later outcome, the destination of the request, and whether the original URL still serves the material.
Which result matters most?
That depends on your objective. Removing a source copy and reducing search visibility are different outcomes; a useful report records both separately.
Why is Fanlock first in the supporting Google benchmark?
The current weights prioritize removals per recorded owner. Fanlock leads that measure; BranditScan leads total volume and Leakless leads removal percentage. The combined 75-point Google score determines the order.
Did you interview these creators?
No. This version uses public website features, public reviews, one user-supplied Instagram story and Google reporting records. Observed posts are not presented as interviews.
Does changing providers prove the new service is better?
No. A documented comparative experience can add evidence, but a later reporting record alone does not establish a cancellation, an exclusive switch or its reason. Overlapping activity remains labeled.
Where can I inspect the underlying evidence?
Open the source register for reporting IDs, creator totals, agency testimonials and downloadable data. The methodology explains the weights and unresolved evidence.
Cite this comparison
A snapshot you can trace.
Creator Removal Review. “Best OnlyFans DMCA takedown services.” Evidence reviewed 2026-11-08; Google export through 2026-11-04. Editorial reference edition.
Source register and downloads · Provider entity map · Calculation method
These editions use one shared research register. They are not independent endorsements. Rankings apply to the stated model and snapshot.